Kubani bem in sorani?

[Kulka]

- coz long time ago i noticed that i will not learn unless i will be a language detective. now i have to make a difficult investigation - who sees whom
i have to work out our last few topics tomorrow. today i must relax, coz i am still in traumatic condition after work

ok, lets compromise - both A are long

[Kulka]

we have to go back to wistin and krdnawa. past tense - coz present i understand how to sort out. past:
for example - i wanted that - ئه‌وه‌م ده‌ویست or ئه‌وه‌م ویست
how to make negative.

krdnawa:
ده‌رگام کرده‌وه‌
ده‌رگات کرده‌وه‌
etc? is it?
and negative.

and in general - negative in past - for example intransitive -نه‌ڕۆیشتم which is "ne" in the beggining and personal ending stayed at the end, right? and for transitive - نه‌مخوارد - which is the personal ending is after "ne", right?

at least i am one of the few who knows the order of alphabet

[kurdimemin_diako]

ئه‌وه‌م ده‌ویست

not very correct

[Kulka]

i get it from kurdish people - someone told me its like that - so it means kurds are not very correct - not me . i am only asking here to make sure, coz i know its a problem with language even for kurdish people

[kurdimemin_diako]

every city has it's own dialect in Kurdistan

[Kulka]

and also - page 64 kaka gyan:

http://clik2rock.org/data/KurdishGrammar.pdf

[ocmentos]

every city has it's own dialect in Kurdistan

that is true, but I am not teaching Kulka xan Slemani accent, I am teaching her standard Sorani.

ئه‌وه‌م ده‌ویست

for example "ئه‌وه‌م ده‌ویست بۆ خانووه‌که‌م" i wanted that for my house (it kinda gives the meaning of need too)

krdnawa:
ده‌رگام کرده‌وه‌
ده‌رگات کرده‌وه‌
etc? is it?
and negative.

and in general - negative in past - for example intransitive -نه‌ڕۆیشتم which is "ne" in the beggining and personal ending stayed at the end, right? and for transitive - نه‌مخوارد - which is the personal ending is after "ne", right?

at least i am one of the few who knows the order of alphabet

yes dergam kirdewe which becomes dergam ne-kirdewe dergat ne-kirdewe
yes for transtive put in your mind it is ne-xward... if you have an object the peronal pronoun attaches to the object .. nanim ne-xward, but if there is no object th "ne" will be the one attached to like the object. so yes nem-xward

[Kulka]

ok great - thank you. but one more thing - negative in past for wistin

[ocmentos]

ok great - thank you. but one more thing - negative in past for wistin

if you use it alone nem-wist (want is transitive) and if you use it with object ne-wist eg: min ewem ne-wist.

[Kulka]

aha

[Kulka]

any idea what should i more know about present and past tense?
if not we will go to past habitual (progressive/continuous - or however it is called).

but before - could my teacher take a look at this link, page 44:
http://clik2rock.org/data/KurdishGrammar.pdf

and explain to me in human understandable words when prepositions from the bottom og the page : به‌، ده‌، له‌ changed to : پێ، تێ، لێ - coz the explanation given in that page doesnt speak to me. and if the change is working only for present tense or always - all the stuff like that, everything about it.

[Kulka]

mamosta gyan - where are youuuuuuu?

[alan131210]

i can answer these

[Kulka]

go on then