kurd-sthanam wrote:jjmuneer wrote:How are you telling me what my dialect is? Ereche=WHY
because i readed a feyli linguist.
http://jiyan.dk/2010/08/l%C3%A6r-feyli- ... lektion-1/jjmuneer wrote:I'm not going to argue with you, because you don't know feyli and you never translated what the man said, you also show no sources. You are just being bias and judging a language based on a few words. I will not bother responding anymore, nothing personal but you just acknowledge a fact.
it was not this topic another topic. i wrote precicesly what the man said. and in FEYLI not english. and than i wrote it in kurmanci.
in the same topic i posted 4 kurdish linguists as source, but you send me a kurdish writer, not real LINGUIST.
send please words when you know, i am searching and posting i give examples but you come with a silly arguments supported by only 1 kurdish writer who is NOT linguist.
1. Prof. Amir hassanpour (support: kurmanci, sorani, hawrami and kirmashani)
2. Mackenzie (North, Central, South and non-kurdish)
3. Prof. Jemal Nebez (north kirmanci, central kirmanci, south kirmanci, gorani/zazaki)
4. abdulrahman zabini (North group, Central group, hewrami/dimili, south group)
parthians are not kurds. kurds are only medes.
Firstly what is my "silly" argument? What that I present facts and put the dialects in the right group?
I don't remember you translating anything, nor can you do it now lol. Even so, I don't understand Kurmanji, so how would I know your translating it right?

but since it is very close I know Kurmanji 100%
parthians are not kurds. kurds are only mede
LOL. Firstly most of central and south Kurdistan was Pahli speaking, I already posted a source earlier on, go scroll back for it. Secondly thats bullshit that its only Mede. Your so brainwashed, as Mede from a linguistic prespective is only Kurmanci(north/south), whilst Fayli(pahli) and Hewrami is Pahli(parthian).
Anyway the fact you stated "it is only Mede" goes to show you never read what I write and source. If you want me to take you seriously, actually read what I write and source.
I will however re quote it:
historical fact on the root of the name of the Pahli is fully clear. As M. R. Izady notes in his work (The Kurds: A Concise Handbook, London, 1992), the territory inhabited by the Pahli/Fayli Kurds was known as "Pahla" (meaning "Parthia") since the 3rd century AD. The area boasted to one of the most important Parthian settlements outside Parthia proper (or Khurasan). The name "Pahla" was likewise used for the area by the early Muslim geographer until the 13th century, after which the name "Luristan" gradually came to replace it.
From "Fahla" has since evolved Faila and Faili -- the modern name of the Pahli Kurds. In fact, there is still a small town called Pahla in the south of the major city of Ilam in South Kurdistan which is the heart of traditional settlement occupied by Pahlis.
1. Prof. Amir hassanpour (support: kurmanci, sorani, hawrami and kirmashani)
He didn't even take into account Zazaki or Laki.
2. Mackenzie (North, Central, South and non-kurdish)
He didn't take into account Laki and didn't consider Hewrami or Zazaki Kurdish.
3. Prof. Jemal Nebez (north kirmanci, central kirmanci, south kirmanci, gorani/zazaki)
Firstly Laki isn't south Kirmanci, yes Khaluri/Kirmanshahi is, but not Laki. As its Pahli.
4. abdulrahman zabini (North group, Central group, hewrami/dimili, south group)
Not even going to bother with this one.
Do you have the actual sources for them?