@ Vladimir
Formerly non-existed ethnicity? It’s very funny that you used these words because Turkish nationalist have been using these words to describe Kurds. You sound like them again. If you go little bit more back, everything was non-existed. Just think little harder, you will see that.
I didn’t say the rebellions of 1920 (Kochgiri), 1925 (Sheikh Said) and 1937-1938 are a sort of National Zaza resistance. I said these people fought for their people who happen to be Zazas. So in that sense, these are Zaza resistance although not nationalist Zaza resistance.
Vladimir wrote:Their former identity was more based on tribalism/nomadism/religion, not Kurdish/Turkish/Zazaki nationalism.
That’s right, but this was not only valid for Zazas. This was also true for Turks and Kurds. Nationalism arrived to these lands little bid late. Zaza picked up nationalism more late. I think it is because of barbaric Turks who burned our cities and killed our leaders when nationalism slowly began to appear in the Middle East. If Kochgiri, Seyh Said, and Dersim massacres didn’t happen, we would be looking to a different picture now.
Actually Kurdish nationalists use our rebellions more than we do even though they know that they weren’t Kurdish rebellions. Why do you ignore them?
Vladimir wrote:Accusing me of a "Turkish nationalist mentality" is very low!
I accused you of thinking similar to "Turkish nationalist mentality" in some issues, not all of them. When I studied in Istanbul, I had discussions with Turkish nationalist a lot. I think your feeling toward Zazas is similar to their feeling to Zazas and Kurds in some issues.
By the way, why you always equates Zazas and Dersim. In fact, only 20% of Zazas are from Dersim.
Although the Zazaist and 'Kırmanc-Alevi' movements still appear to be marginal in Dersim and elsewhere in Turkey, Kurdish nationalists perceived them to be potentially dangerous and suspected the Turkish secret police of being the true motor behind this separatism in Kurdish ranks. For obvious reasons, they were equally distrustful of the official sponsorship of the Turkey-wide Alevi resurgence, which they considered as an ill-disguised attempt to drive a wedge between the Kurdish Alevis and the other Kurds.
As I told you Turks believe that foreign countries are driving Kurdish nationalism in Turkey to divide their country and make Turkey weaker. What you write above is almost the same with their thinking again.
I understand why some people want to support Zazas because it may be beneficial to them. But accusing us as being government agents is so ridiculous and insulting. Look if Kurdish nationalist really wanted to solve problems between us and them, they could do it many years ago, and they would be stronger. But they don’t do this. Rather, they want to treat to us like Turks treat to them. This is wrong and will not benefit their movement. Truth is too much for them and they chose hypocrisy. No truth, no justice.