Roj Bash Kurdistan

hey guys,i want hear your mind.
i was reading a little about kurdish history and found this articel by shafaq news.

http://www.shafaaq.com/en/history/65-sa ... ians-.html

Professor Rashid Yasemi at Tehran University in a series of articles entitled "Sassanids, were Kurds not Persians"

so i serached via google and found a comment from a user in a forum, who sayd the sassanid kings were kurds, because they had kurdish names. i looked and was surprising, they had really names very similar to kurdish, see :

Ardashir , Yazdegert , Anosheerewan , Ardawan ======= Erdeshîr , Ezdigirt , Ênoshîrewan , Erdewan -> they are all nothwestern iranic names

and i continued to search a little more, so i reaaded something about the kurdish clan Schabankara. this clan sayd they are descendants of Sassanid king Ardashir 1

so, waht you think about that?

Well sassanids were just a dynasty, so of course they had Kurds amongst them, and yes even Aradshir was Kurdish. You also have to take into account their capital was in Kirmanshah a Kurd fayli city.

jjmuneer wrote:Well sassanids were just a dynasty, so of course they had Kurds amongst them, and yes even Aradshir was Kurdish. You also have to take into account their capital was in Kirmanshah a Kurd fayli city.

yes, but the capital was not sassanid, it was parthian, so i think parthians are the ancestor of gorani and kirmancki speaker, because the language is similar.
the sassanids only take it because it was magnificently.

but you are right, the sassainds just was an dynasty of different peopels, also kurds. i personally think the iranian people dont make an difference at this time, so the sassanids sayd, they just subject the partians because they were too helenic and too little iranic.

but this king name "Anuschirvan (roman name was Chosrau)" is 100% kurdish.

hevalo27 wrote:

jjmuneer wrote:Well sassanids were just a dynasty, so of course they had Kurds amongst them, and yes even Aradshir was Kurdish. You also have to take into account their capital was in Kirmanshah a Kurd fayli city.

yes, but the capital was not sassanid, it was parthian, so i think parthians are the ancestor of gorani and kirmancki speaker, because the language is similar.
the sassanids only take it because it was magnificently.

but you are right, the sassainds just was an dynasty of different peopels, also kurds. i personally think the iranian people dont make an difference at this time, so the sassanids sayd, they just subject the partians because they were too helenic and too little iranic.

but this king name "Anuschirvan (roman name was Chosrau)" is 100% kurdish.

The Faylis ancestors are the Parthians.

The Faylis ancestors are the Parthians.

yes i think also.... goran, hawraman, , lek, lor, they are all faylis, just different names and the kirmancki kurds in north kurdistan are linguistic near to them.

hevalo27 wrote:

The Faylis ancestors are the Parthians.

yes i think also.... goran, hawraman, , lek, lor, they are all faylis, just different names and the kirmancki kurds in north kurdistan are linguistic near to them.

Very true my brother, Goran, Hawraman, lek lor as you say are all Fayli, because Fayli is corruption of 'Pahli'. Pahli=Parthian.