Roj Bash Kurdistan

Why we have only four meat eating teeth?

We have 32 teeth, out of which only four are meat eating teeth made to tear meat, the rest are made to cut and grind plants. So, by nature, we are not meat eaters but plant eaters, because we can not use the four meat eating teeth, although we eat meat and enjoy it.

Another important point, which proves we are plant eaters, not meat eaters, is the temperature of animals, the meat of which we eat, is higher than our temperature. This means, by nature, the meat of these animals, doesn't fit our body. Because our temperature is not high enough to melt and digest meat, which needs higher temperature. This is why eating meat leads to cholesterol and high blood pressure. Because of our lower temperature, the food of meat sticks to our blood pipes obstructing blood flow.

So what is the secret of these four meat eating teeth, which we have? There are two answers for this question:

-Either these four teeth are a new evolutionary developments to change human species to a complete meat eater.

2- or it is the other way round, these four meat eating teeth are the last remnants of all our meat eating teeth when we were able only to eat meat.

So which one is the correct one?

To answer this question we have to compare the behaviour of wild plant and meat eaters. We see plant eaters hardly fight among each other or against different species. They almost coexist and live together without any problems. This excludes competition for mating. But this is not so with meat eaters. They fight between each other and against other species.

How much does the behaviour of each similar to us, humans? There is no doubt we, humans, and wild meat eaters have a lot in common in behaviour. We are extremely competitive and aggressive. If not for law and order, we do a lot worst damage to each other than wild meat eaters do to each other.

So we have an innate meat eater aggression, which proves we were once meat eaters and all our teeth were made to tear meat to eat it. I noticed this innate meat eater aggression on a one and half year old child, who proved to be an expert strangler to remove competition. This is all because her 6 month old brother was taking some attention from her. She expertly tried to sit on his mouth to strangle him.

Is this evolutionary development bad or good? I say it is good. The moments humans converted to plant eaters their brain became bigger, became cooperative and started to exploit environment and other creatures for their survival. This is also why we have been able to modern world.

We are omnivorous, like many apes, especially cheetahs. That is the reason of our vegetables teeh / meat teeth.

Our brain evolution jumped when men started to cook their meal : more nutritive. Now, our only brain activiy takes 26% of our calories per day. Even by sitting and watching the dullest TV show…

The second revolutionnary step was at Neolithic, when human adults had to disgest milk and dairy (before only children could).

Now our challenge is to face a sugar addicted alimentation. But when people want to become veggies they need to add B12 vitamin and many other elements in their alimentation, because we could not live as complete vegetarians anymore.

Evolution is not linear : some people can not still digest lactosis or gluten : a remain of their prehistorian past.

All the people I know who do not eat red meat are passive and highly intelligent

If they eat eggs, dairy or fish, they do not need meat. We need ANIMAL products… like chocolate

Piling wrote:If they eat eggs, dairy or fish, they do not need meat. We need ANIMAL products… like chocolate

Some people take bread and wine to worship their unseen god I eat Chocolate to worship the Great God Cadbury

I take the wine option

Piling wrote:I take the wine option

The reason of behind it that the teeth work in our mouth like grind machine secondly we eat meat after cooking when it cooked and become easy to eat..

The other advantage to cook meat is that it kills bacterias, worms,, parasites, etc…

I wonder if adepts of Paleo diet shelter colonies of tenias…

yokmurobert wrote:The reason of behind it that the teeth work in our mouth like grind machine secondly we eat meat after cooking when it cooked and become easy to eat..

Actually it is a lot easier, a lot more nutritious and full of enzymes if eaten uncooked. But it is testier if cooked. So we lose a lot by cooking it.

Piling wrote:We are omnivorous, like many apes, especially cheetahs. That is the reason of our vegetables teeh / meat teeth.

Our brain evolution jumped when men started to cook their meal : more nutritive. Now, our only brain activiy takes 26% of our calories per day. Even by sitting and watching the dullest TV show…

The second revolutionnary step was at Neolithic, when human adults had to disgest milk and dairy (before only children could).

Now our challenge is to face a sugar addicted alimentation. But when people want to become veggies they need to add B12 vitamin and many other elements in their alimentation, because we could not live as complete vegetarians anymore.

Evolution is not linear : some people can not still digest lactosis or gluten : a remain of their prehistorian past.

We are omnivorous on the basis of a simple common sense because we eat plants and meat. But meat doesn't fit our metabolic system because it needs a higher temperature than our body, which can not provide. We have only four canning teeth left but can not use it to tear meat. We use them for chewing or grinding. So by nature we are no longer meat eaters. The meat we eat mostly can not be digested, ends up in the colon to cause toxins and free radicals that absorbed into blood stream.

A German physician made an experiment over a hundred years ago in Japan after noticing the stamina of Japanese rickshaw men. He hired two rickshaw men. He fed one of them with beef and the other with the usual Japanese food. After a week he loaded a weight of 80Kg in the rickshaw of each men and asked each to pull his rickshaw and run as long as he could. After four days, the one on the diet of beef exhousted and couldn't run any more. But the other one, after 4 weeks, he was still running.

Piling wrote:The other advantage to cook meat is that it kills bacterias, worms,, parasites, etc…

I wonder if adepts of Paleo diet shelter colonies of tenias…

The Beginner’s Guide to the Paleo Diet

The Paleo Diet is an effort to eat like we used to back in the day…WAY back in the day. If a caveman couldn’t eat it, neither can you.

This means anything we could hunt or find – meats, fish, nuts, leafy greens, regional veggies, and seeds. Sorry, the pasta, cereal, and candy will have to go! Instead, you’ll be making things like chicken stir fry and paleo spaghetti.

Oh lord, another “diet.” I know, it sounds like a fad/marketing ploy, but it’s actually quite legit. You see, tens of thousands of years ago, before Nike, Cap’n Crunch, and Healthy Choice meals, our ancient ancestors thrived as hunter-gatherers. Although it’s been a really long time, our genetics haven’t changed that much since then.

The average Homo Sapien back then: tall, muscular, agile, athletic, and incredibly versatile.

The average Homo Sapien now: overweight, out of shape, stressed out, unhappy, sleep deprived and dying from a myriad of preventable diseases.

So what the hell happened? Agriculture! A few thousand years ago humans discovered farming, the agricultural revolution took off, and we advanced from hunter-gatherers to farmers. We settled down, formed societies, and the human race progressed to what we are today.

Link to Must Read Article:

http://www.nerdfitness.com/blog/2010/10 ... aleo-diet/

But you could not eat as in Paleolithic period (which one, btw ? before or after cooking with fire ?) ; meat was from wild prey, so with full of nutriments and vitamins if we compare with our domestic beef and chicken ; fruits were wild also, more bitter than sweet, and so with not much sugar, etc.

There are many weirdo blog about paleo diet and obviously they have a poor knowledge of historical alimentation. I saw some recipes like Paleo chocolat muffins. Big lol.

And if you are from Australia, or tropical area, or Northern areas, you can not have the same diet. You have to eat according to your ancestors (if you have various origins what a mess).

Generally, in Europe as in Middle Eastern, no tomatoes, no potatoes, no egg plants, no bananas, etc. All these things did not exist in Prehistoric times (and nit even in Medieval period).

So this stupid 'Paleo Spaghetti' are imposture :

http://www.nerdfitness.com/blog/2012/02 ... spaghetti/

No chocolate, of course

All traditionnal diet are good… for native people, just because they have thousands of years to adapt their genes (or they died). Inuit eate essentielly meat and fish, never vegetables, but were healthy. Now they die because of sugar and cereals. Other population have a more vegetarian (never vegan) diet and were ok.

I love dairy and cheese and milk and meat I am not ill at all. But if I eat sugar or sweet meals I feel bad. That's my own particular case.

Ayurveda or traditional Chinese physicians (and also in Middle East) analyzed the particular constituion of an individual and determined what he lacks, what he needs, what he had to restrain. That's wisdom. Human societies are so mixed now that we can not decide there is one single best diet for everybody.

Evolutionary changeover takes place at least during a 100,000 year. There is no doubt once we were fully carnivorous with full carnivorous teeth. Our diet change over mainly to plants must have started over hundreds of thousands of years ago. But why this change over to a diet of plants? it must have happened because of the shortages of meat for whatever reason. Because of the shortage of meat, our ancestors forced to depend on a diet of plants, which started by gathering it for consumption. This must have also lasted for over a thousand hundred year before learning to plant food, which led to the evolution of agriculture and communities.

This hypothesis could be wrong completely. Change over to a diet of plants, mainly, could have some thing to do with an evolutionary diversions. Evolutionary developments are like some sort of researches and developments with out control or direction or purpose, which leads to new developments without any prediction.

Early man had few if any weapons with which to slaughter large and often furious animals, they would have had to compete with scavenges for meat

Also they would have observed birds and animals eating grasses and berries and in their desperate search for food they would probably have tried anything

I am going out into the woods to hunt and gather an icecream in the park beyond

With chocolate sauce on it