The conflict in East Kurdistan after the Iranian revolution 1979
After the Iranian Revolution in 1979, a sharp and bloody conflict situation quickly emerged in the Kurdish regions of northwestern Iran. The Kurdish groups, who have long fought for recognition, autonomy and cultural rights, were confronted by the new Islamic republic with brutal repression.
The government's response was far from meeting the people's demands for democracy and self-government — instead, extensive mass executions of young Kurds were carried out in cities such as Pawe, Saqez, Mariwan and Sanandaj.
This was part of a systematic strategy to crush the resistance through military violence and terror.
Several attempts for dialogue and negotiations were initiated between Kurdish leaders and representatives of the Iranian regime. However, these conversations, led by, among others, Sheikh Ezzadin Hosseini, failed repeatedly - not because of the Kurds' unwillingness, but because the regime lacked genuine will to compromise.
Documents and testimonies show that the government actually used the negotiations as a tactical tool to win time, rally forces and weaken Kurdish movements. In addition, the regime was characterized dealing with conflict of internal power struggles, where different factions had different views on the extent of repression and the resolution of the conflict.
In this complex and violent context, Sheikh Ezzadin played a crucial role. As the leader of the Kurdish delegation, he was a prominent secular and pragmatic player, whose goal was to unite the Kurdish groups and advance their demands for democracy, rights and autonomy in a peaceful and inclusive way.
Unlike the religiously-ruled regime, Sheikh Ezzadin represented a secular vision for the future of the Kurds, where the fight for equality and human rights took centre stage — beyond religious and ideological distinctions.
He demanded that the government recognize political organizations like Komala and Fedayeen and that the negotiations be held on equal terms, without the Kurds being forced to hide their political composition or give up their legitimate demands.
Despite hard pressures and the government attempts to undermine the conversations through manipulation and suspicion, Sheikh Ezzadin held to his principles.
His integrity and unwillingness to compromise the rights of the Kurds were used as a pretext to break the talks,
which clarifies the regime's unwillingness to recognize the political legitimacy of the Kurds.
Sheikh Ezzadin thus became a symbol of peaceful resistance and dialogue in a time when conflict was characterized by repression and violence.
His secular leadership contributed to creating a broader collection of Kurdish forces under a common umbrella, and he represented the will of the Kurdish people in an attempt to build a future based on democracy, justice and respect for human rights, despite the harsh regime that in reality planned continued military confrontation.